Revision as of 13:08, 31 May 2020 (view source) BrimstoneSaladWiki (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Originally contributed here: https://philosophicalvegan.com/posting.php?mode=edit&f=7&p=47839 Needs editing into linkable major and minor sections, removal of "I" language, an...")		Latest revision as of 14:42, 16 October 2020 (view source) Thebestofenergy (talk | contribs) (→‎Cholesterol)
(75 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Originally contributed here: https://philosophicalvegan.com/posting.php?mode=edit&f=7&p=47839	+	Cardiovascular disease, otherwise commonly called heart disease and stroke, are the largest single cause of mortality.
−	Needs editing into linkable major and minor sections, removal of "I" language, and sources should be integrated into main body as per wiki formatting. Images need to be uploaded to the Wiki and inserted.
−	== Number One Cause of Death ==	+	According to the World Health Organization and Center For Disease Control and Prevention, of the 56.9 million deaths globally in 2016, 15.2 million (26%) were due to heart disease and stroke. In contrast, a mere 1.4 million (2.4%) were due to road injuries<ref>https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death </ref> <ref>[https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death]</ref> <ref>[https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lead1900_98.pdf]</ref>. Nearly every year, cardiovascular diseases are the number one cause of death. Over the years there have been many proposed mechanisms and likely candidates for causation. One of the most studied is cholesterol, and due both to that and the contentious nature of cholesterol on online health circles (particularly alt-med and health trends) it is the main focus of this article.
−	Think for a moment about what the top cause of death is worldwide. One may assume it to be murder or automobile accidents.
−	Perhaps it is starving children, war, or cancer. However, all of these answers would be incorrect. As it so happens, even with the summation of all these figures together, it still would not reach the enormous death toll that is heart disease and stroke. According to the World Health Organization (2019, WHO), of the 56.9 million deaths globally in 2016, 15.2 million (26%) were due to heart disease and stroke. In contrast, a mere 1.4 million (2.4%) were due to road injuries.
		+	= Relevance to Veganism =
−	== What Does Mainstream Science Think Causes It? ==	+	Vegetarians and vegans are consistently found to have lower risk for cardiovascular disease, and this makes up a large part of the [[health argument]] against meat. It makes a strong argument for at least reduction of most animal product consumption and incorporating more healthy plant-based foods, though as discussed elsewhere the health argument doesn't strictly recommend veganism, since very small amounts of animal products are probably not significant and it's hard to make any compelling case for health against leather, fur, or animal tested cosmetics which vegans typically avoid. Regardless of the degree of reduction it compels, any reduction in animal products is a reduction in animal suffering too which is an important goal of veganism (not just making people vegan). There are concerns for unintended consequences that have to be kept in mind, see [[health argument]] and [[one step]] for more.
−	With death and cardiovascular disease on the rise in the 1950s, research was undertaken to determine the best course of preventive action. It was discovered that a fatty molecule in the blood called cholesterol appeared to increase plaque formation. The more of it one seemed to have, the higher their risk of the disease. Today, and thirteen Nobel Prizes later, there is a near-unanimous scientific agreement on the role of cholesterol in heart disease (Ference et al., 2017). There is high-quality evidence that demonstrates this, and medications such as statins and PCSK9 inhibitors have been created with the intent of saving lives and preventing the disease (Libby, 2008). However, on the internet, the role of social media influencers has instilled doubt into the public eye and confusion around this issue. According to them, the experts have gotten it completely wrong, and the conventional wisdom on cholesterol is misplaced. Many people are choosing to abandon prescribed LDL lowering statin drugs to patients at risk, or who have heart disease. My view is that this is anti-science and unacceptable. Ultimately, anyone can believe whatever they wish, so long as it is not harmful to others. In this article, I will show beyond any reasonable doubt why cholesterol causes heart disease, as well as analyze the various lines of argumentation used to deny this link, to see if they stand to the weight of scientific evidence.
		+	= Causes =
−	== What is Cholesterol? ==
−	To begin, it is imperative to understand what cholesterol is. Cholesterol is an organic molecule produced by the liver that serves a critical role in steroid and hormone production, as well as cellular membranes (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2461). Cholesterol is a carrier of what are called lipoproteins, of which there are five main types: high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), Intermediate density lipoproteins (IDL), and Lipoprotein a (LPa). However, this article will focus on LDL because of its clinical significance to heart disease risk. According to a paper published by the [i]European Heart Journal [/i](2017), <blockquote>"In most people, LDL particles constitute ∼90% of circulating apoB-containing lipoproteins in fasting blood (Figure 1)"</blockquote>	+	=== Saturated Fat ===
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/ThFrYkU.png[/img]	+	Over the years there have been many proposed mechanisms and likely candidates for causation. With death and cardiovascular disease on the rise in the 1950s, research was undertaken to determine the best course of preventive action. Work on rabbits and other mammals found that feeding certain lipids induced atherosclerosis. Correlations in population (epidemiology) research showed a correlation with total fat and rates of heart disease. Later this research was criticized by researchers Yerushalmy and Hilaboe. They found that animal protein showed an even stronger association casting doubt on whether fat was really to blame. However, this makes sense given this was before it was known that saturated fat was uniquely damaging to heart health, and so animal protein would show a stronger association than total fat. In the following years a scientific consensus has formed to keep saturated fat below 5-10% of total calories for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. For a full article on why this is, and an exploration of arguments skeptics use, see the full article on [[Saturated Fatty Acids]]
−	(Ference et al., 2017, p. 2461).
−	However, Ference et al (2017). posits that in clinical practice, a better metric than merely looking at the amount of LDL in the blood, is to assess the total amount of cholesterol contained within these LDL particles; going forward, this will be referred to as LDL-C (p. 2461).	+	=== Cholesterol ===
−	== LDL vs HDL ==	+	The main mechanism by which saturated fatty acids raise heart disease risk, is by increasing cholesterol; a fatty molecule in the blood strongly linked to increased plaque formation. The more of it one has, the higher their risk of the disease. Some of the most transformative work in this regard came from Mike Brown and Joe Goldstein, who had been performing various experiments on cholesterol metabolism. Brown and Goldstein found that those with a genetic condition characterized by elevated LDL-cholesterol (familial hypercholesterolemia) had LDL that would not bind to the rate-controlling enzyme of cholesterol synthesis known as, HMG-CoA reductase [https://science.sciencemag.org/content/231/4734/126.long]. HMG-CoA reductase is the main target of the class of cholesterol controlling statin medication used today. Ultimately, their work lead to the discovery of the LDL receptor, earning them the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1985 (A. G. Motulsky,. 1986). Brown and Goldstein paved the way and were paramount in understanding cholesterol in the later years. Today, and thirteen Nobel Prizes later, there is a near-unanimous scientific agreement on the role of cholesterol in heart disease [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28444290/]. There is high-quality evidence that demonstrates this, and medications such as statins and PCSK9 inhibitors have been created with the intent of saving lives and preventing the disease. For the reasons why this is, see the full article on [[Cholesterol]]
−	Despite cholesterol being an aforementioned integral component of organic systems, the worry from various health authorities is having too much of it within the blood over a prolonged period, which is a disorder known as [b]hypercholesterolemia[/b]. While all lipoproteins may play a role in atherosclerosis (heart disease), the most studied are [b]LDL[/b] and [b]HDL[/b]. To put simply, LDL is known as the "bad" cholesterol, and HDL can be thought of as the "good" cholesterol. HDL carries cholesterol back to the liver, while LDL carries it out where it can be deposited inside the coronary arteries (American Heart Association (AHA), 2017). A simplified explanation of the view is to imagine a pipe being slowly clogged and restricting flow, in this case, blood, to vital organs, eventually leading to death. The problem occurs when there is too much LDL per HDL such that the cholesterol begins to deposit along the inner lining of the artery walls (AHA, 2017).
−	== Cholesterol Denialism & Skepticism ==	+	<blockquote>"The disease mechanisms elicited by LDL and the other causal factors are multifaceted as discussed below, involving lipoprotein retention, inflammatory cell recruitment, foam cell formation, apoptosis and necrosis, smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and matrix synthesis, calcification, angiogenesis, arterial remodeling, fibrous cap rupture, thrombosis, and more." [https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721]</blockquote>
−	People who do not accept or downplay the role of cholesterol in heart disease are not taken seriously by the scientific community and are sometimes referred to by experts as "cholesterol denialists" (Boseley, 2018). The most significant critics of the lipid hypothesis, or cholesterol as a cause of heart disease, are the International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics (TINCS), who often rail against the use of statin medications. Professor Rory Collins (2018) of Oxford University has criticized many of these individuals, especially when they espouse pseudoscientific claims against the use of life-saving statin medications. He has said this is no different to denying smoking: [quote]"The claims that blood LDL cholesterol levels are not causally related to cardiovascular disease (which is really in the same realm as claiming that smoking does not cause cancer) are factually false," (Rory Collins The Guardian, n.p).[/quote] When the director of TINCS Uffe Ravonskov was asked why he believes this, he said that the experts only say cholesterol is damaging to heart health because[quote] "the vast majority are paid generously by the drug companies." (qtd. In Bosely, 2018. n.p).[/quote]
−	== Does Low LDL Cause Cancer and Higher All-Cause Mortality? ==	+	The way LDL cholesterol increases risk of CVD is by lodging in the arterial walls, accumulating over time.<br> [[File:Clogged_artery.jpg|thumb]]
−	Among the more credible claims that the TINCS make, is to point out that high LDL cholesterol in old age has a longevity advantage, while low LDL shortens lifespan. Ravonskov's finding is not novel. The 30-year follow up of the Framingham Heart Project found that for people over the age of 50, high cholesterol was protective, (Anderson et al., 1987). In 2016, The Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) responded to Ravonskov's claims of high LDL being protective. They pointed out that it is privy to extreme bias, such as reverse causation, meaning that it might not be that low LDL causes illness, but that illness causes low LDL (CEBM, 2016). The evidence shows that this is indeed the case. RCTs have shown that interventional LDL lowering treatments reduce CVD without, leading to increased cancer risk (Strandberg et al, 2004). Furthermore, a genetic study in the elderly also refutes Ravonskov's claim, as those over 60 with genetically high LDL had a high risk, and those with genetically low LDL had a lower risk, as expected (Postmus et al. 2015).	+	This causes the radius where blood can move freely in the artery to decrease (image 1), leading to a higher risk of cardiac events.
−	== The Importance of Genetic and Interventional Data in the Assessment of Causation ==	+	If enough HDL cholesterol is available, it will latch onto the LDL cholesterol in the artery wall, lug it back into the bloodstream, and carry it to the liver. Since cholesterol is taken out of arterial cells, the process is sometimes known as cholesterol efflux. Since cholesterol is returned to the liver (where it was assembled in the first place), reverse transport is another name for the process. By either name, it's good for vascular health, since the liver collects cholesterol from the HDL particles, packages it into bile salts and bile acids, and dumps it into the intestines for excretion in the feces. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/HDL_cholesterol_Protecting_your_heart_and_arteries]
−	Other problems are not looking at the duration of exposure and survivor bias. This highlights the unreliability of cross-sectional and other population studies like Ravonskov's and the importance of randomized genetic research for addressing cholesterol and whether or not it causes heart disease. In this respect, one may ask how scientists know cholesterol causes heart disease. In science, it is often stated that correlation does not equal causation. Meaning, just because a variable is associated with another, does not mean one variable caused the other. For instance, it could be the case that those who live near telephone wires have a higher risk of heart disease; however, this is not a demonstration that telephone wires cause heart disease. The way to separate correlation from causation when it comes to cholesterol is by looking at genetic research.
−	Some of the most transformative work in this regard came from Mike Brown and Joe Goldstein, who had been performing various experiments on cholesterol metabolism. Brown and Goldstein found that those with a genetic condition characterized by elevated LDL-cholesterol [b](familial hypercholesterolemia)[/b] had LDL that would not bind to the rate-controlling enzyme of cholesterol synthesis known as, HMG-CoA reductase (A. G. Motulsky,. 1986). HMG-CoA reductase is the main target of the class of cholesterol controlling statin medication used today. Ultimately, their work lead to the discovery of the LDL receptor, earning them the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1985 (A. G. Motulsky,. 1986). Brown and Goldstein paved the way and were paramount in understanding cholesterol in the following years.	+	After LDL cholesterol is deposited in the artery, the body fights back by sending immune system cells called macrophages that ingest LDL particles. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/can-we-reduce-vascular-plaque-buildup]<br>
		+	LDL-laden macrophages become foam cells, that promote inflammation and further the development of atherosclerotic plaques.<br>
		+	This process triggers muscle cells in the artery wall to multiply and form a 'cap' over the area, enclosing the plaque.
−	== How Do We Know LDL-c Causes Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease? ==	+	The soft plaque beneath the cap is dangerous. If the blood pressure spikes, it puts pressure on the thin wall of the plaque, which can break open, form a clot, and cause a stroke or a heart attack. When the wall breaks, blood cell fragments, called platelets, stick to the site of the injury. They may clump together to form blood clots. Clots narrow the arteries even more, limiting the flow of oxygen-rich blood to your body. Depending on which arteries are affected, blood clots can worsen angina (chest pain) or cause a heart attack or stroke.
−	In 2017, the European Society of Cardiology released a massive consensus paper concluding that LDL-c causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The analysis found the following:
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/b5X3MAO.png?1[/img]
−	[quote]Separate meta-analyses of over 200 prospective cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials including more than 2 million participants with over 20 million person-years of follow-up and over 150 000 cardiovascular events demonstrate a remarkably consistent dose-dependent log-linear association between the absolute magnitude of exposure of the vasculature to LDL-C and the risk of ASCVD; and this effect appears to increase with increasing duration of exposure to LDL-C. (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2460)[/quote]
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/B94DZKR.png?1[/img]	+	<blockquote>"Depending on their age and lifestyle, most people have small inflammations in the walls of their blood vessels. These can develop in different ways. In people who have high LDL cholesterol, the phagocytes (scavenger cells) in blood “eat” more cholesterol particles. This means that cholesterol is more likely to stick to the walls of affected blood vessels.<br>
−	Above we see various criteria for causation of LDL on ASCVD from table 1 of the paper.	+	Inflammations can also weaken the blood vessel wall, which might then tear. If blood suddenly comes into contact with the cholesterol-rich deposits as a result, a blood clot might form. That is because our bodies try to seal the wound in the blood vessel wall, just like when scabs form if you cut your skin.
−	== Genetic Evidence Provides Strong Evidence For Causation ==	+	If this happens, the consequences will depend on various things, including how big the blood clot is. A big clot can completely block the blood vessel, causing a heart attack or stroke. But the blood clots that form are often only small – they fix the damage in the blood vessel wall and do not have any noticeable consequences. Then the cut heals on its own. This can lead to scarring and calcification of the blood vessel wall, which can gradually make the blood vessel narrower without blocking it completely. The blood vessel wall becomes thicker and stiffer. The medical term for the hardening of blood vessel walls is arteriosclerosis.
−	Furthermore, they concluded that[quote] "Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD." (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2460).[/quote] As explained on page 2463, a mendelian randomization study is a genetic study in which participants are naturally randomized based on if they have an LDL-c raising or lowering genetic mutation. This allows an unbiased estimate that separates cholesterol from other confounding factors such as smoking. As mentioned,  familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition where a loss of function of the LDL receptor leads to markedly increased levels of LDL-c. As it turns out, these individuals have a significantly elevated lifetime risk of the disease and, in some instances, may die in their teens and twenties of heart disease (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2462). Furthermore, those who inherit the FH mutation as compared to unaffected siblings provide substantial grounds for a causative effect; the authors explain,[quote] “The fact that siblings who inherit an FH mutation have markedly elevated plasma LDL-C levels and a corresponding dose-dependent markedly elevated lifetime risk of ASCVD as compared to their unaffected siblings provides powerful evidence that LDL causes ASCVD” (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2462). [/quote]
−	Contrastingly, genes that lower LDL-c, also correspondingly lower the lifetime risk of CVD (Ference et al., 2017, p. 2462) (Libby, 2018). The fact that Ravonskov and colleagues choose to ignore this data highlights their bias and tarnishes their credibility.	+	Inflammations can develop in any artery in the body. They are particularly dangerous in the large arteries that carry blood to the brain and heart. Narrow coronary blood vessels can cause chest pain (pectoral angina) during physical strain. If a coronary blood vessel becomes blocked, blood will no longer flow to part of the heart muscle, which might result in a heart attack. If a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked, it might lead to a stroke." [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279327/]</blockquote>
−	== What is the Optimal Range For LDL? ==	+	It's not exactly certain why LDL cholesterol accumulates in the arterial walls, but it's thought to be because a protein called SR-B1 'ferries' LDL particles into and then across the endothelial cells that line arteries. It was also found that a second protein called DOCK4 partners with SR-B1 and is necessary for the process.<br>
−	Evidence from (Fernández-Friera et al., 2017) and (O'Keefe et al., 2004) show that when LDL is above 50-70mg/dL plaques form, and below this, the disease does not occur.	+	In fact, higher levels of SR-B1 and DOCK4 were found in the disease-prone regions long before atherosclerotic plaques formed.<br>
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/HyodmD4.jpg[/img]	+	SR-B1 is not well understood, as it would seem to help the transport of cholesterol back to the liver. [https://cnjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41016-019-0178-3] [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6376870/]
−	== What Increases Serum Cholesterol Within The Diet? ==	+	<blockquote>"SR-B1 also facilitates the efflux of cholesterol from peripheral tissues, including macrophages, back to liver."</blockquote>
−	Now that I have established that LDL cholesterol does indeed cause heart disease, it is essential to know what increases cholesterol in the blood as this is controversial online. The three main factors that increase LDL are dietary cholesterol, saturated fat, and trans- fat.
−	=== Dietary Cholesterol: Does it Raise Serum Cholesterol? ===	+	A level of LDL cholesterol going over the threshold of 50 to 70 mg/dl has been associated with incrementally increased risk of atherosclerosis (image 2). [https://www.onlinejacc.org/content/70/24/2979] [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109704007168?via%3Dihub] [[File:LDL cholesterol and atherosclerosis.large.jpg|thumb]]
−	Eating cholesterol from food (dietary cholesterol) increases cholesterol in the blood (serum cholesterol). In scientific research, this is usually done with egg feeding as they contain a high amount of dietary cholesterol. However, most cholesterol feeding studies have found either a weak or no correlation, or only an association in specific individuals. Often these individuals are deemed "hyper-responders." This variability has led many to conclude that the relationship is weak or non-existent. With countless blogs and videos all over the internet, including some experts mistakenly concluding dietary cholesterol does not affect serum cholesterol.
−	One of the proponents of this misinformation is Chris Kressor, an acupuncturist, and an online blogger. Kressor references a 2005 study looking at cholesterol feeding that found eggs raised cholesterol in insulin sensitive, but not in the diabetic or obese participants (Tannock et al., 2005). However, upon further investigation of the subject characteristics table, those that had low baseline serum cholesterol had an increase, while those who had a high baseline did not find an increase. In other words, the higher the baseline cholesterol, the less of an impact eating more had. In addition, a meta-analysis of forty studies from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found a similar finding; dietary cholesterol only raised serum cholesterol in those with a dietary intake under 900mg/dL (Berger et al., 2015).	+	=== Carbohydrates ===
		+	[[Carbohydrates]]
−	== Hegsted Equations and Meta-Regression Analyses ==	+	=== Sedentary Lifestyle ===
−	Interestingly, this is predicted by a mathematical equation called the Hegsted equation. The Hegsted equation is a way to predict the expected change in serum cholesterol from added dietary cholesterol and is remarkably consistent (Postmus et al. 2015, p 1063). The relationship between dietary and serum cholesterol is a non-linear hyperbolic curve, as shown in the figure below by Postmus et al. (2015) meaning it would be expected to level off.
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/l7ETKhB.png?1[/img]
−	Simply, the higher the starting cholesterol is, the less of an impact eating more will have. Importantly, for this reason, decreasing dietary cholesterol would have a stronger impact.
−	== LDL: HDL Ratio Negates Negative Effects? ==	+	=== Diabetes ===
−	Skeptics like Kressor and others may claim that cholesterol feeding increases HDL, and therefore the risk is attenuated. This is also a false claim as cholesterol feeding has been shown to increase the HDL to LDL ratio in an unfavorable direction (Weggemans et al., 2001)
−	== Large Boyent LDL particles are benign? ==	+	=== Smoking, Alcohol & Drug Use ===
−	Further claims by cholesterol skeptics such as Kressor are that saturated fat/dietary cholesterol only increases a large "fluffy" type of LDL, which is harmless. This claim is also false as large LDL increases heart disease risk by 44%, while small LDL increases risk by 63% (Samia et al. 2009).
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/dqFWbFd.png?1[/img]
−	== How Do We Know Saturated Fat Raises Cholesterol? ==	+	=== Genetics ===
−	395 separate metabolic ward studies, or controlled feeding experiments, confirm that saturated fat also raises LDL cholesterol. It has a much more substantial impact than that of dietary cholesterol (Clarke et al., 1997). Change in cholesterol from saturated fat can be predicted with the Keys and Mensink equations. Prediction of serum cholesterol with both types of equations together produces the most robust predictive capability, effectively removing ∼80% of the variability. Therefore, it is difficult to argue against this data.
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/9LDhrbj.png?1[/img]
−	[img]https://i.imgur.com/i3fUf2J.png?1[/img]
−	The first figure is from (Hegsted et al., 1993), showing predicted change in cholesterol versus the observed change, while the second figure uses the Mensink equations to show predictions for saturated fat on raising cholesterol.
−	With these data, we can conclude that the variability excuse does not pan out.	+	= Can a Vegan Diet Reverse Heart Disease? =
−	== Does The LDL Raising Ability of Saturated Fat Actually Result In Worse Outcome? ==	+	= References =
−	based on 47 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies from the Scientific Advisory Committee (2019), saturated fat increases the risk of CVD outcomes, the replacement of saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat reduces this risk, and percentage of calories from saturated fatty acids should not exceed 10% of calories and there is no reason to change these recommendations (SACN, 2019).
−
−
−
−	[size=150][u][b]References[/b][/u][/size]
−	[list=]A. G. Motulsky. (1986). The 1985 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine. Science, 231(4734), 126-129. doi:10.1126/science.3510453
−	[list=]American Heart Association. (2017). Control your Cholesterol. Retrieved from https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/cholesterol/about-cholesterol[/list]
−	[list=]Anderson, K. M., Castelli, W. P., & Levy, D. (1987). Cholesterol and mortality: 30 Years of follow-up from the Framingham study. Jama, 257(16), 2176-2180. doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03390160062027[/list]
−	[list=]Berger, S., Raman, G., Vishwanathan, R., Jacques, P. F., & Johnson, E. J. (2015a). Dietary Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 102(2), 276-294. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.100305[/list]
−	[list=]Boseley, Sarah. (2018, Oct 30,). Butter nonsense: The rise of the cholesterol deniers. The Guardian Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2127073977[/list]
−	[list=]Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). Leading Causes of Death, 1900-1998. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/lead1900_98.pdf[/list]
−	[list=]Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, The. (2016). CEBM response: Lack of an Association or an Inverse Association Between Low-Density-Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Mortality in the Elderly: A Systematic Review – a Post Publication Peer Review. Retrieved from https://www.cebm.net/2016/06/cebm-response-lack-association-inverse-association-low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol-mortality-elderly-systematic-review-post-publication-pee/[/list]
−	[list]Clarke, R., C. Frost, C., Collins, R., Appleby, P., & Peto, R. (1997). Dietary lipids and blood cholesterol: quantitative meta-analysis of metabolic ward studies. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 314(7074), 112–117.[/list]
−	[list=]Ference, B. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Graham, I., Ray, K. K., Packard, C. J., Bruckert, E., Catapano, A. L. (2017). Low-Density Lipoproteins Cause Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. 1. Evidence From Genetic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Studies. A Consensus Statement From the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. European Heart Journal, 38(32), 2459-2472. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144[/list]
−	[list=]Fernández-Friera, L., Fuster, V., López-Melgar, B., Oliva, B., García-Ruiz, J. M., Mendiguren, J., Sanz, J. (2017). Normal LDL-Cholesterol Levels are Associated with Subclinical Atherosclerosis in the Absence of Risk Factors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(24), 2979-2991. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.024[/list]
−	[list=]Hegsted, D. M., Ausman, L. M., Johnson, J. A., & Dallal, G. E. (1993). Dietary Fat and Serum Lipids: An Evaluation of the Experimental data. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57(6), 875-883. doi:10.1093/ajcn/57.6.875[/list]
−	[list=]Libby, P. (2008). Clinical Lipidology: A companion to braunwald's heart disease E-book (Chapter 5, Lipoproteins: Mechanisms for Atherogenesis and Progression of Atherothrombotic Disease ed.). US: Saunders. Retrieved from https://www-sciencedirect-com.proxy./science/article/pii/B9781416054696500093[/list]
−	[list=]Mensink, R. P. (1993). Effects of the Individual Saturated Fatty Acids on Serum Lipids and Lipoprotein Concentrations. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57(5 Suppl), 711S-714S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/57.5.711S[/list]
−	[list=]O'Keefe, J. H., Cordain, L., Harris, W\. H., Moe, R. M., & Vogel, R. (2004). Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is Better and Physiologically Normal. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43(11), 2142-2146. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.046[/list]
−	[list=]Postmus, I., Deelen, J., Sedaghat, S., Trompet, S., de Craen, Anton J M, Heijmans, B. T. Jukema, J. W. (2015). LDL Cholesterol Still a Problem in Old Age? A Mendelian Randomization Study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(2), 604-612. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv031[/list]
−	[list=]SACN. (2019). SACN Saturated Fats and Health 2019. (1). SACN: SACN. Retrieved from http://publicinformationonline.com/download/205487[/list]
−	[list=]Samia Mora, James D. Otvos, Nader Rifai, Robert S. Rosenson, Julie E. Buring, Paul M Ridker. (2009). Lipoprotein Particle Profiles by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Compared with Standard Lipids and Apolipoproteins in Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Women. Journal of the American Heart Association, Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663974/[/list]
−	[list=]Tannock, L. R., O'Brien, K. D., Knopp, R. H., Retzlaff, B., Fish, B., Wener, M. H.,  Chait, A. (2005). Cholesterol Feeding Increases C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Levels in Lean Insulin-Sensitive Subjects. Circulation, 111(23), 3058-3062. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.506188[/list][/list]
−	[list=]Kressor, C. (2008) Three eggs a day keep the doctor away! Retrieved from https://chriskresser.com/three-eggs-a-day-keep-the-doctor-away/ April 2 2020[/list]
−	[list=]Weggemans, R. M., Zock, P. L., & Katan, M. B. (2001). Dietary Cholesterol From Eggs Increases the Ratio of Total Cholesterol to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Humans : A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(5), 885-891. doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.5.885[/list]
−	[list=]World Health Organization. (2018). The top 10 causes of death. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death[/list]
−	[list=]Strandberg TE, Pyörälä K, Cook TJ, et al. Mortality and incidence of cancer during 10-year follow-up of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 2004;364(9436):771‐777. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16936-5[/list]

---

Latest revision as of 14:42, 16 October 2020

Cardiovascular disease, otherwise commonly called heart disease and stroke, are the largest single cause of mortality.

According to the World Health Organization and Center For Disease Control and Prevention, of the 56.9 million deaths globally in 2016, 15.2 million (26%) were due to heart disease and stroke. In contrast, a mere 1.4 million (2.4%) were due to road injuries^{[1] [2] [3]}. Nearly every year, cardiovascular diseases are the number one cause of death. Over the years there have been many proposed mechanisms and likely candidates for causation. One of the most studied is cholesterol, and due both to that and the contentious nature of cholesterol on online health circles (particularly alt-med and health trends) it is the main focus of this article.

Relevance to Veganism

Vegetarians and vegans are consistently found to have lower risk for cardiovascular disease, and this makes up a large part of the health argument against meat. It makes a strong argument for at least reduction of most animal product consumption and incorporating more healthy plant-based foods, though as discussed elsewhere the health argument doesn't strictly recommend veganism, since very small amounts of animal products are probably not significant and it's hard to make any compelling case for health against leather, fur, or animal tested cosmetics which vegans typically avoid. Regardless of the degree of reduction it compels, any reduction in animal products is a reduction in animal suffering too which is an important goal of veganism (not just making people vegan). There are concerns for unintended consequences that have to be kept in mind, see health argument and one step for more.

Causes

Saturated Fat

Over the years there have been many proposed mechanisms and likely candidates for causation. With death and cardiovascular disease on the rise in the 1950s, research was undertaken to determine the best course of preventive action. Work on rabbits and other mammals found that feeding certain lipids induced atherosclerosis. Correlations in population (epidemiology) research showed a correlation with total fat and rates of heart disease. Later this research was criticized by researchers Yerushalmy and Hilaboe. They found that animal protein showed an even stronger association casting doubt on whether fat was really to blame. However, this makes sense given this was before it was known that saturated fat was uniquely damaging to heart health, and so animal protein would show a stronger association than total fat. In the following years a scientific consensus has formed to keep saturated fat below 5-10% of total calories for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. For a full article on why this is, and an exploration of arguments skeptics use, see the full article on Saturated Fatty Acids

Cholesterol

The main mechanism by which saturated fatty acids raise heart disease risk, is by increasing cholesterol; a fatty molecule in the blood strongly linked to increased plaque formation. The more of it one has, the higher their risk of the disease. Some of the most transformative work in this regard came from Mike Brown and Joe Goldstein, who had been performing various experiments on cholesterol metabolism. Brown and Goldstein found that those with a genetic condition characterized by elevated LDL-cholesterol (familial hypercholesterolemia) had LDL that would not bind to the rate-controlling enzyme of cholesterol synthesis known as, HMG-CoA reductase [1]. HMG-CoA reductase is the main target of the class of cholesterol controlling statin medication used today. Ultimately, their work lead to the discovery of the LDL receptor, earning them the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1985 (A. G. Motulsky,. 1986). Brown and Goldstein paved the way and were paramount in understanding cholesterol in the later years. Today, and thirteen Nobel Prizes later, there is a near-unanimous scientific agreement on the role of cholesterol in heart disease [2]. There is high-quality evidence that demonstrates this, and medications such as statins and PCSK9 inhibitors have been created with the intent of saving lives and preventing the disease. For the reasons why this is, see the full article on Cholesterol

"The disease mechanisms elicited by LDL and the other causal factors are multifaceted as discussed below, involving lipoprotein retention, inflammatory cell recruitment, foam cell formation, apoptosis and necrosis, smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and matrix synthesis, calcification, angiogenesis, arterial remodeling, fibrous cap rupture, thrombosis, and more." [3]

The way LDL cholesterol increases risk of CVD is by lodging in the arterial walls, accumulating over time.

This causes the radius where blood can move freely in the artery to decrease (image 1), leading to a higher risk of cardiac events.

If enough HDL cholesterol is available, it will latch onto the LDL cholesterol in the artery wall, lug it back into the bloodstream, and carry it to the liver. Since cholesterol is taken out of arterial cells, the process is sometimes known as cholesterol efflux. Since cholesterol is returned to the liver (where it was assembled in the first place), reverse transport is another name for the process. By either name, it's good for vascular health, since the liver collects cholesterol from the HDL particles, packages it into bile salts and bile acids, and dumps it into the intestines for excretion in the feces. [4]

After LDL cholesterol is deposited in the artery, the body fights back by sending immune system cells called macrophages that ingest LDL particles. [5]
LDL-laden macrophages become foam cells, that promote inflammation and further the development of atherosclerotic plaques.
This process triggers muscle cells in the artery wall to multiply and form a 'cap' over the area, enclosing the plaque.

The soft plaque beneath the cap is dangerous. If the blood pressure spikes, it puts pressure on the thin wall of the plaque, which can break open, form a clot, and cause a stroke or a heart attack. When the wall breaks, blood cell fragments, called platelets, stick to the site of the injury. They may clump together to form blood clots. Clots narrow the arteries even more, limiting the flow of oxygen-rich blood to your body. Depending on which arteries are affected, blood clots can worsen angina (chest pain) or cause a heart attack or stroke.

"Depending on their age and lifestyle, most people have small inflammations in the walls of their blood vessels. These can develop in different ways. In people who have high LDL cholesterol, the phagocytes (scavenger cells) in blood “eat” more cholesterol particles. This means that cholesterol is more likely to stick to the walls of affected blood vessels.

Inflammations can also weaken the blood vessel wall, which might then tear. If blood suddenly comes into contact with the cholesterol-rich deposits as a result, a blood clot might form. That is because our bodies try to seal the wound in the blood vessel wall, just like when scabs form if you cut your skin.

If this happens, the consequences will depend on various things, including how big the blood clot is. A big clot can completely block the blood vessel, causing a heart attack or stroke. But the blood clots that form are often only small – they fix the damage in the blood vessel wall and do not have any noticeable consequences. Then the cut heals on its own. This can lead to scarring and calcification of the blood vessel wall, which can gradually make the blood vessel narrower without blocking it completely. The blood vessel wall becomes thicker and stiffer. The medical term for the hardening of blood vessel walls is arteriosclerosis.

Inflammations can develop in any artery in the body. They are particularly dangerous in the large arteries that carry blood to the brain and heart. Narrow coronary blood vessels can cause chest pain (pectoral angina) during physical strain. If a coronary blood vessel becomes blocked, blood will no longer flow to part of the heart muscle, which might result in a heart attack. If a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked, it might lead to a stroke." [6]

It's not exactly certain why LDL cholesterol accumulates in the arterial walls, but it's thought to be because a protein called SR-B1 'ferries' LDL particles into and then across the endothelial cells that line arteries. It was also found that a second protein called DOCK4 partners with SR-B1 and is necessary for the process.
In fact, higher levels of SR-B1 and DOCK4 were found in the disease-prone regions long before atherosclerotic plaques formed.
SR-B1 is not well understood, as it would seem to help the transport of cholesterol back to the liver. [7] [8]

"SR-B1 also facilitates the efflux of cholesterol from peripheral tissues, including macrophages, back to liver."

A level of LDL cholesterol going over the threshold of 50 to 70 mg/dl has been associated with incrementally increased risk of atherosclerosis (image 2). [9] [10]

Carbohydrates

Carbohydrates

Sedentary Lifestyle

Diabetes

Smoking, Alcohol & Drug Use

Genetics

Can a Vegan Diet Reverse Heart Disease?

References

1. Jump up ↑ https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
2. Jump up ↑ [11]
3. Jump up ↑ [12]