Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freeganism"

From Philosophical Vegan Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(wiki quotting?)
(Wiki quoting)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Hard to do much better than the wiki definition, history and policy impact. And if we could wouldn't we want to change the main definition also? In such a circumstance is it ok to copy verbatim or should we keep in quote form?
 
Hard to do much better than the wiki definition, history and policy impact. And if we could wouldn't we want to change the main definition also? In such a circumstance is it ok to copy verbatim or should we keep in quote form?
 +
 +
Not sure if this is how other small mediawiki operations do it, but seems we can copy verbatim without quote-marking:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL]
 +
 +
<blockquote>As of July 15, 2009 Wikipedia has moved to a dual-licensing system that supersedes the previous GFDL only licensing. In short, this means that text licensed under the GFDL only can no longer be imported to Wikipedia, retroactive to 1 November 2008. Additionally, Wikipedia text might or might not now be exportable under the GFDL depending on whether or not any content was added and not removed since July 15 2009. See Wikipedia:Licensing update for further information.
 +
 +
Verbatim copying under the GFDL is one of the ways to reuse Wikipedia articles and other material. You may only use this approach for pages that do not incorporate text that is exclusively available under CC-BY-SA or a CC-BY-SA-compatible license. See Re-use of text under the GNU Free Documentation License.
 +
 +
For the purposes of this discussion, Wikipedia is considered to be a Collection of Documents. (An alternative interpretation could be that Wikipedia is a single Document, which invalidates the discussion on this page.)</blockquote>
  
 
== Page Layout Ideas? ==
 
== Page Layout Ideas? ==

Revision as of 22:50, 16 July 2017

How it relates to veganism, how pragmatic it can be when done right, how the end goal should be bringing awareness to end food waste, but also how it can be a vital toolkit in cheaply running new projects, supporting the homeless and domestic animals which are obligate carnivores. --NonZeroSum (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2017 (CEST)


Wiki quoting

Hard to do much better than the wiki definition, history and policy impact. And if we could wouldn't we want to change the main definition also? In such a circumstance is it ok to copy verbatim or should we keep in quote form?

Not sure if this is how other small mediawiki operations do it, but seems we can copy verbatim without quote-marking:[1]

As of July 15, 2009 Wikipedia has moved to a dual-licensing system that supersedes the previous GFDL only licensing. In short, this means that text licensed under the GFDL only can no longer be imported to Wikipedia, retroactive to 1 November 2008. Additionally, Wikipedia text might or might not now be exportable under the GFDL depending on whether or not any content was added and not removed since July 15 2009. See Wikipedia:Licensing update for further information.

Verbatim copying under the GFDL is one of the ways to reuse Wikipedia articles and other material. You may only use this approach for pages that do not incorporate text that is exclusively available under CC-BY-SA or a CC-BY-SA-compatible license. See Re-use of text under the GNU Free Documentation License.

For the purposes of this discussion, Wikipedia is considered to be a Collection of Documents. (An alternative interpretation could be that Wikipedia is a single Document, which invalidates the discussion on this page.)

Page Layout Ideas?

Keep going with facts & information, activism and alternative perspectives? --NonZeroSum (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2017 (CEST),

Sounds like a good general guideline.--BrimstoneSaladWiki (talk) 02:01, 16 July 2017 (CEST)

To Draw from

Forum Threads

Hyperlinks [2]

  • How Much Food Can You Find In A Dumpster? (Vegan Gains)
  • Vegan makes profit from roadkill
  • Is it okay to eat meat that you did not buy?
  • Part Vegan Part Freegan? The concept of use?
  • Eggs and Veganism
  • Backyard rescue hens
  • Veganism and Dumpster Diving
  • FREEGAN VEGAN BEEGAN’S!?

External links

Wikipedia [3]

Very thorough, we can probably reference to their history overview. --NonZeroSum (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2017 (CEST)


Trashwiki [4]

This site is the go to that every freegan uses for maps and information on big cities when they don't know their way around or have someone to show them. Helplful 'last checked' dates also. Interesting recorded Freegan News and Events also.[5] --NonZeroSum (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2017 (CEST) Freeganism is a practice and ideology of limited participation in the conventional economy and minimal consumption of resources, particularly through recovering wasted goods like food.[1] The word "freegan" is a portmanteau of "free" and "vegan".[2] While vegans might avoid buying animal products as an act of protest against animal exploitation, freegans—at least in theory—avoid buying anything as an act of protest against the food system in general.

Freeganism is often presented as synonymous with "dumpster diving" for discarded food, although freegans are distinguished by their association with an anti-consumerist and anti-capitalist ideology and their engagement in a wider range of alternative living strategies, such as voluntary unemployment, squatting abandoned buildings, and "guerilla gardening" in unoccupied city parks.[3]