Difference between revisions of "Talk:Companion Animal Care"
From Philosophical Vegan Wiki
(→Consequentialism) |
(→Consequentialism) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::I think we should nix the philosophy section entirely and integrate that content into the other sections. The whole thing is philosophical in nature. We can have a kind of summary of advice at the end in bullet points with links up to the relevant sections if we want. The only thing that should be separate are the deontological perspectives, just kind of showing alternate/not evidence based views some have or have advocated.--[[User:BrimstoneSaladWiki|BrimstoneSaladWiki]] ([[User talk:BrimstoneSaladWiki|talk]]) 05:45, 14 July 2017 (CEST) | ::I think we should nix the philosophy section entirely and integrate that content into the other sections. The whole thing is philosophical in nature. We can have a kind of summary of advice at the end in bullet points with links up to the relevant sections if we want. The only thing that should be separate are the deontological perspectives, just kind of showing alternate/not evidence based views some have or have advocated.--[[User:BrimstoneSaladWiki|BrimstoneSaladWiki]] ([[User talk:BrimstoneSaladWiki|talk]]) 05:45, 14 July 2017 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I reorganized things a bit, putting those philosophy comments under activism (aside from deontology). I think we can draw distinctions within the articles between the more calculating "just the facts" direct cause and effect consequentialism, and virtue style rule consequentialism which relies on the psychology of self-improvement and is less concerned with maximal efficacy and efficient resource use.--[[User:BrimstoneSaladWiki|BrimstoneSaladWiki]] ([[User talk:BrimstoneSaladWiki|talk]]) 06:13, 14 July 2017 (CEST) | ||
== Semantics == | == Semantics == | ||
Revision as of 04:13, 14 July 2017
Relevant threads on the forum
- 7 Reasons Why Cats are Terrible Pets (UV video)[1]
- Is “owning” a cat vegan?[2]
- Snails[3]
- ABLC’s “ethical veganism”[4]
- Having pets (again)[5]
- Pets that are obligate carnivores/omnivores…[6]
- owning lizards[7]
- Feeding your pets Vegan?![8]
- The future of pets[9]
- What do I feed the animals in my house?[10]
- Pet/Dog Ownership[11]
- Pet Ownership (Animal Domestication)[12]
- Confinement isn’t always cruel – possible example [13]
- Advice wanted on care of rescued chicken, and ducks. [14]
- Companion Animal Care [15]
Consequentialism
- Like this? - brimstoneSalad
- Amazing, fank you!
- You could also talk about how you think people should always get dogs over cats, as the philosophy section can be a place for divergences and meta-concepts. I've put cat runs in the main facts and information, I'll also include about company, but unsure as UV said:
- . . .you can also help to have fewer cats particularly if they are over two years old as a recent study suggested while kittens actually like to have a lot of playmates older cats really don't tolerate a lot of company. - Unnatural Vegan
- What do you reckon so far?--NonZeroSum (talk) 02:32, 14 July 2017 (CEST)
- I think we should nix the philosophy section entirely and integrate that content into the other sections. The whole thing is philosophical in nature. We can have a kind of summary of advice at the end in bullet points with links up to the relevant sections if we want. The only thing that should be separate are the deontological perspectives, just kind of showing alternate/not evidence based views some have or have advocated.--BrimstoneSaladWiki (talk) 05:45, 14 July 2017 (CEST)
- I reorganized things a bit, putting those philosophy comments under activism (aside from deontology). I think we can draw distinctions within the articles between the more calculating "just the facts" direct cause and effect consequentialism, and virtue style rule consequentialism which relies on the psychology of self-improvement and is less concerned with maximal efficacy and efficient resource use.--BrimstoneSaladWiki (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2017 (CEST)
Semantics
I moved and expanded talk on word usage to a section on semantics.--BrimstoneSaladWiki (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2017 (CEST)
- No problem, that was garrethdsouza's, copyed a few peoples quotes into general themes as examples, but might make sense to lose that bit altogether in the end. --NonZeroSum (talk) 04:06, 14 July 2017 (CEST)
