Difference between revisions of "Palm Oil"

Revision as of 22:51, 3 September 2020

IN WORK

Palm oil is probably the best example of a product that would be considered vegan, and that yet does almost as much damage as animal products.

The damage it causes easily classifies it as one of the worst things in the world. It's less bad than animal agriculture, but not by much.

The oil is produced from the flesh of the palm fruit and the kernel (once crushed).

Deforestation

Palm oil agriculture is the cause of a lot of deforestation, and the demand keeps increasing. Approximately 85-90% of all palm oil is produced in Malaysia and Indonesia, and it's estimated that 1/3 of all vegetable oil used in the world is palm oil.

That high demand, and the constant increment of it, leads to a very intensive agriculture in Malaysia and Indonesia, where space has to be made clear in order for palm oil plantations to be expanded. Those areas are also covered for the major part by rainforests, which are the only place to pave over in order to plant palm trees.

To put this into context, we can take the island of Borneo, Indonesia, as an example. It's the third largest island in the world, with a surface of roughly 750'000 square kilometers, which is about three times the size of all of Oregon (roughly 250'000 square kilometers).

The island is home to one of the oldest rainforests, which covers most of the island--for about 430'000 square kilometers--, and 47% of its deforestation (since the year 2000) is due to palm oil. Over 42'000 square kilometers (about 10% of its total rainforests, and almost a fifth of the state of Oregon) were paved over to make space exclusively for palm oil monocoltures.

This is just one example, in one island. A more detailed view of the island's deforestation can be found at: https://atlas.cifor.org/borneo/#en

Local people and animal suffering caused by the deforestation

It's estimated that about 45 million people live in forests in Indonesia alone.

The amount of deforestation that palm oil causes translates into a significant amount of wild animals' habitats destruction, and consequently their suffering and death.

Palm oil’s fungibility and unsustainability

[blockquote]"fungibility is the property of a good or a commodity whose individual units are essentially interchangeable, and each of its parts is indistinguishable from another part" [1][/blockquote]

What that means is that no matter the source or the way it's acquired, palm oil is the same and interchangeable--whether it would be from a 'sustainable' source, or not.

'Sustainable' palm oil land is often referred to as already deforested areas where palm trees for palm oil are grown, where no further damage would be done.

The reason why 'sustainability' isn't there for palm oil, and the reason why additional palm oil demand always results in a problem, is that while the demand of palm oil may increase or decrease, the offer for 'sustainable' palm oil is still the same amount--as the amount of 'sustainable' land for palm oil wouldn't grow if demand grows, and instead more rainforests would have to be destroyed to make space.

Here is a simplified explanation of why additional demand of palm oil can't be sustainable, regardless of the source:

• There is X amount of tropical land currently available for cultivation of palm oil.
• X amount of land can grow X1 amount of tropical product.
• If demand for tropical products is X1, there's no problem.
• If demand for all tropical products is greater than X1, let's say X1 + Y1, then an Y amount of rainforest gets burnt down in order to fill the difference of demand between X1 and X1 + Y1.

To give a more specific example:

Let's say you're using 'sustainable' palm oil. You use 1,000 tons of it a year. That tonnage is grown within the confines of X, the land currently available.

But other people still want palm oil, and are willing to use palm oil from the land produced by burning the rainforest. They have no particular desire for the rainforest to be burnt to produce it, but they don't really care either way. To them it's 100% fungible, same thing.

The only reason they're burning down the rainforest to produce it, is because you, the person using 1,000 tons of palm oil grown on existing land, are already using up all of the other palm oil. If you didn't use that palm oil, they wouldn't simply throw it away. They'd sell it to somebody else. Now somebody else has more oil, and doesn't need to go through the trouble of burning down the rainforest to get it.

Therefore, if you were to use 'sustainable' palm oil, it would actually make no difference--as you would just take that source away from someone else instead, who would then be forced to acquire it from an unsustainable source.

To read more about this, check out the discussion on the PV Forum. [2]

Is palm oil healthy?

49.3% of palm oil is saturated fats, which would mean an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Palm oil is therefore one of the most unhealthy ingredient you can use.

Conclusions, where palm oil is found, and how to avoid it

Palm oil is mainly divided in three categories:

• Processed foods: roughly 71%
• Consumer products (such as certain soaps, cosmetics, detergents and candles): roughly 24%
• Energy sector: roughly 5%

Therefore, it's in our future's best interest to do our best to avoid palm oil whenever possible.