|
|
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | | |
| | | |
| + | === 1. How to use media more productively === |
| | | |
− | === 1. Namethetrait history/highlights and #nametheprofessor call out to Sisyphus Redeemed ===
| |
− |
| |
− | '''Part 1: Intro to controversy'''
| |
− |
| |
− | FriendEd debate, moment to reflect on advocacy and educate ourselves on ethics, sincere ask to Ask Yourself and followers to get onto firmer ground and expand the range of their arguments.
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | '''Part 2: Open questions'''
| |
− |
| |
− | What logical argumentation should we be pushing? How much humility in epistemology? How much psychological maneuvering in the approach? And finally the different answers to these questions depending on whether we're conversing 1 on 1 vs with an audience.
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | '''Part 3: UV's nametheprofessor comment'''
| |
− |
| |
− | We're concerned with the claim that namethetrait as a consistency test is air-tight if it is not grounded in some firm meta-ethical premises, Isaac's reluctance to meet people at the foundations of their ethics is concerning, but if that's not necessary and everything can be run through namethetrait we'd like it if he could find one philosophy professor who is immersed in these questions to agree.
| |
− |
| |
− | Read UV's comment, and play comedy clip "Calling all Jan Michael Vincent’s" to zooming in on #nametheprofessor.
| |
− |
| |
− | Shoutout to Sisyphus Redeemed, you've argued the difference between subjective and objective is a categorical error, so you might be the least bias person to way in here, vegan, atheist, big time science advocate and all round bad ass.
| |
− |
| |
− | For background we're going to play out the video with a hilight reel of the events leading up to this video, to get people up to speed. Full response to Ask Yourself's response to the forum thread upcoming, as well as lots of exciting videos including a "Top 25 Most influential moments for veganism in history", a response to David Benatar, a full run down and critique of anti-natalism within the vegan movement and an interview with a freegan charity food distributor. Till next time...
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | '''Part 4: Highlight reel/montage'''
| |
− |
| |
− | AskYourself being called up on his alienating persona and argument style by other vegans.
| |
− |
| |
− | Ask Yourself & Vegan Gains call out to debate the Skeptic community.
| |
− |
| |
− | FriendEd labeling vegans objectivists to disregard one true morality, Ask Yourself denying this and trying to use namethetrait as formal logic.
| |
− |
| |
− | PhiloVegan commenting namethetrait is coherent as formal logic only under consequential ethics and asking for some humility.
| |
− |
| |
− | AskYourself insisting he’s an ontological subjectivist, namethetrait is perfect, building an echo chamber and binging on calling everyone retard and murking.
| |
− |
| |
− | UnnaturalVegan offering her opinion that PhiloVegan is right that namethetrait is fine as informal argument but not as formal logic, promising she’ll do a video if he can get a professor to agree with it.
| |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 81: |
Line 46: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | === 4. Anti-Natalism critique === | + | === 4. Anti-Natalism in the vegan movement === |
| | | |
| Inmendham, OGMizen, various expressions of rational to fatalist amongst vegan youtubers. | | Inmendham, OGMizen, various expressions of rational to fatalist amongst vegan youtubers. |
Line 100: |
Line 65: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | === 5. [https://philosophicalvegan.com/wiki/index.php/Freeganism Freeganism] interview === | + | === 5. [https://philosophicalvegan.com/wiki/index.php/Freeganism Freeganism] Freegan Practices Explainer and Open Letter to Vegan Advocates === |
− | | |
− | '''Part 1: Run down of advocacy for freeganism we see on...'''
| |
− | | |
− | '''''Tv'''''
| |
− | | |
− | • Clean polished woman on BBC showing how she has reformed shelf policies of all major supermarkets in Denmark.
| |
− | | |
− | • Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall making bread pudding from dumpster dived bread with some of London's poor youth, War on Want campaign
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''''Newspapers'''''
| |
− | | |
− | • Junk food cafes opening up
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''''YouTube'''''
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://activistjourneys.wordpress.com/freeganism/ Video list]
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9rwJmzVDE8 How Much Food Can You Find In A Dumpster? (Vegan Gains)]
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3315 ^Forum discussion about the video]
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://www.youtube.com/user/Shelbizleee Shelbizleee]
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP18TDSuSjamG1cyvKgijTQ Carb Up and Carpe Diem!]
| |
− | | |
− | • [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4ix7ht1GXEa9WjAx17Li_w EcoPeaceful]
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''''Social media'''''
| |
− | | |
− | • Statement by charities not accepting waste bread for not wanting to validate/perpetuate the industry practice.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''Part 2: Video showing round The Real Junk Food Project Doncaster'''
| |
− | | |
− | How the operation runs hygienically and distribution.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''Part 3: Slippery slope?'''
| |
− | | |
− | Could it be seductive diet/lifestyle like paleo that limits your engaging with the hard rational ethics that are more likely to keep you vegan.
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | '''Part 4: How do we fix the problem?'''
| |
− | | |
− | Homeless dependency on it, irony of frugal activists being better able to travel with safety net of supermarket suburb dumpsters.
| |
| | | |
− | We don’t want the fix to be that we carry on wasting at the rate we are, but that it get’s burnt off in some slightly more environmentally friendly way. We want all the remedies discussed so far and foraging and gleaning street kitchens.
| + | [https://philosophicalvegan.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3695 Thread] |
Revision as of 16:54, 11 November 2018
Welcome to the Philosophical Vegan channel
Our goal is to stimulate and inform debates on philosophy and science around vegan issues, and vegan adjacent issues such as environmentalism, ethics, and activism.
If you haven't, be sure to check out the forum and wiki. These serve as the basis for most subject matter on the channel.
Philosophical Vegan deals mainly with meta-activism, as a resource for vegans and our allies working toward environmental and animal welfare ends, but we welcome non-vegans for discussion and debate on the subjects too and we hope these videos can be entertaining and educational for anybody interested in philosophy, ethics, or environmentalism.
Beyond forum and wiki content, you'll find debates, philosophical criticism, and collaborations here on the channel, as well as Q&As
We mean to help foster community of rational minded vegans and curious allies on youtube and beyond.
The most important thing is being willing to question assumptions and go beyond dogma to support our values with reasoned arguments and evidence.
We hold that it is reasoned argument, not emotional appeal, that will move the open minded among the intellectual influencers out there to go vegan.
Sometimes not right away. But we can at least put some pebbles in shoes.
Not that we're opposed to cute animal videos, or the shocking ones in the right context. That can work for some, particularly as a final push for somebody who already agrees with veganism on a philosophical level, but it's not our focus, so you won't see very much in the way of slaughterhouse footage here and certainly not without some warning. You might see more cute animals though.
Future Projects
0. [Mirror] Open Letter to Matt
google drive copies
1. How to use media more productively
2. Top 25 Most influential moments for veganism in history.
vegetarian-history
Forum Game/Debate: Most important moments in vegan history.
My animal ethics history blog post
3. Benetar Response
forum thread
4. Anti-Natalism in the vegan movement
Inmendham, OGMizen, various expressions of rational to fatalist amongst vegan youtubers.
Youtube Anti-Natalists
He debunks himself often enough reminding us that his words are just the product of scar tissue basically rerouted brain tissue through long-term depression he’s grown too used to to abandon. Just a negative utilitarian who doesn’t see any virtue in accepting the limits of human control, it’s bizarrely religious in that he clings to the sense that the only meaning could come from if there were a merciful god that would fix all of nature.
Possibly take down of his joke theory of everything essay:
Rational Wiki wrote: Gary Mosher: Physics crank who fervently asserts an alternate "theory of everything", rejecting all evidence of special/general relativity and the double slit experiment. He is also known as "inmendham", and alternately proposes a "destroy all life" philosophy.
Thread-Gary-Inmendham-Theory-of-Everything
critique-of-inmendhams-radical-pessimism.html
Website
5. Freeganism Freegan Practices Explainer and Open Letter to Vegan Advocates
Thread