r/askphilosophy’s criticism of Sam Harris

General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cirion Spellbinder
Master in Training
Posts: 993
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 10:28 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan
Location: Presumably somewhere

r/askphilosophy’s criticism of Sam Harris

Post by Cirion Spellbinder » Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:07 pm

I know there are some fans of Harris on this forum and I recently found a post on the r/askphilosophy subreddit which is considered “frequently asked” exposing the problems with him. Here’s the link: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhilosophyF ... h=70e4b146. As someone ignorant of Harris, what do you guys think of the criticisms?
I haven't played Papers, Please in a long time so I don't feel justified in keeping my old signature. Ergo, I have a new one.

User avatar
knot
Master in Training
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:34 pm

Post by knot » Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:01 am

Only made it through the first paragraph
Harris is racist - specifically, he's an Islamophobe who thinks that we ought to do terrible things to people with brown skin from predominantly Muslim countries, like nuclear bomb them, torture them, and racially profile them.
That's a cartoonish and wrong representation of his views. I stopped reading since this made the author seem not serious. :|

User avatar
Jebus
Master of the Forum
Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:08 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan

Post by Jebus » Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:03 am

knot wrote:
Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:01 am
Only made it through the first paragraph
Harris is racist - specifically, he's an Islamophobe who thinks that we ought to do terrible things to people with brown skin from predominantly Muslim countries, like nuclear bomb them, torture them, and racially profile them.
That's a cartoonish and wrong representation of his views. I stopped reading since this made the author seem not serious. :|
He probably was serious. A serious idiot. A lot of idiots think Sam Harris is a racist. I agree, the author lost all credibility after the first paragraph.
How to become vegan in 4.5 hours:
1.Watch Forks over Knives (Health)
2.Watch Cowspiracy (Environment)
3. Watch Earthlings (Ethics)
Congratulations, unless you are a complete idiot you are now a vegan.

User avatar
knot
Master in Training
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:34 pm

Post by knot » Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:02 pm

At first I also thought the author must be stupid. But looking more into it, I think it's a deliberate attempt at a character assassination, since nearly all dissenting comments have been removed and in the thread the author basically admits to misrepresenting Sam Harris.

If I had to guess, the author(s) don't like his politics or are mad that he has taken shots at philosophy a number of times (even though he holds a BA in the subject), so they think it's fine to slander him.

esquizofrenico
Newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:54 am
Religion: None (Atheist)
Diet: Vegan

Post by esquizofrenico » Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:15 am

My biggest problem with Sam Harris is his use of the "magic bullet" argument as the sole principle to determine who are the good guys in international politics. Intention is of course important when judging a certain political strategy, but there must be some point in which if you are showing so little worry about the consequences of your politics, just because at the bottom of your heart you have very good intentions, there is no effective difference with someone with evil intentions and you. In general I think that he tends to oversimplify issues in a search for clarity, something that is good and in general we should try to do, but he takes it to the region of cronical reductionism.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest