Philosophical Vegan Forum

Hello, all. I was looking at the comments section of the recent Joe Rogan podcast about veganism. Some guy in the comments posted a Google Document that took me aback. It is 40 pages (and counting?!) of PubMed studies (and more) talking about meat and veganism.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zKl ... sFxig/edit#

If this doesn't work for you: http://archive.is/63FCT

If something is weird about it, I just saved it: goo.gl/xbyNBO

Well, holy crap... My need for links to one's knowledge has been met. I need to read threw this instead of just skim threw it. Thanks for sharing. I wonder if anything on the list is incorrect.

_Doc wrote:Well, holy crap... My need for links to one's knowledge has been met. I need to read threw this instead of just skim threw it. Thanks for sharing. I wonder if anything on the list is incorrect.

Remember, it's not just the blue, underlined things that are links. Even the greens are links to other sources.

I don't understand why they had to mention Vegan Gains in the list of studies.

I don't understand why none of the links are direct links. They are all links to Facebook. Based on the two links I have checked, the editorial comments need to be taken with an unhealthy dose of salt.

St3v3B wrote:I don't understand why none of the links are direct links. They are all links to Facebook. Based on the two links I have checked, the editorial comments need to be taken with an unhealthy dose of salt.

There may be a lot of good stuff in there, but the problem with that kind of unreliability is the effort needed to desalinate the resource.
Comprehensiveness AND reliability are essential.

It's like cowspiracy: some good stuff in there, and the general point is right, but when they get a couple numbers wrong (like saying 50% when it's probably somewhere closer to 30-something % ) it makes it hard to recommend.