Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

General philosophy message board for Discussion and debate on other philosophical issues not directly related to veganism. Metaphysics, religion, theist vs. atheist debates, politics, general science discussion, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
EquALLity
I am God
Posts: 3022
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:31 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: United States of Canada

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by EquALLity »

miniboes wrote:They can't. Their military is extremely weak and it would lead to war with many if not all major western powers. The risk is that they might do serious damage to Seoul, but they will never conquer SK.
Are you sure? They say they have nuclear weapons, and China is their ally. Would the rest of the west get involved if America stays out?

Serious damage to Seoul is enough to keep our troops in South Korea anyway, IMO. There are over ten million people there.
"I am not a Marxist." -Karl Marx
User avatar
EquALLity
I am God
Posts: 3022
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:31 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: United States of Canada

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by EquALLity »

brimstoneSalad wrote:It's not coming straight from the government, and I didn't see any quotes in the article from government officials. It's coming from media, over which the degree of oversight isn't 100% clear.
That's what I said. The government-run media endorsed Trump. I didn't say the dictator himself endorsed Trump directly.
IMO he did endorse him indirectly via the media. It's North Korea; do you really think the (government-run) media would be allowed to put out info or opinions the government doesn't support?
brimstoneSalad wrote: Trump's position on Korea is.
Why are you calling it Korea?
I don't think South Korea wants to be grouped in with North Korea. :P
brimstoneSalad wrote: He wants to engage in direct talks
That's great, and I don't think any democrats would be opposed to that.
brimstoneSalad wrote:he wants to pull out of the South (American presence in South Korea is one of the major issues compromising trust and creating hostility with the North.
There should be distrust. North Korea shouldn't be trusted. And if it prevents North Korea from harming the South Korean people (which I think it does), then it's important that we keep our soldiers there.
brimstoneSalad wrote:Like miniboes said, that's not likely something they're capable of.
It could be, and even if it can't conquer SK, NK can do a lot of damage to SK.
brimstoneSalad wrote:It would really just be a withdrawal that would let Asia handle its own problems.
Why do you say that like it's necessarily a good thing?

I don't agree with the idea that we should say "it's not our problem" and not worry about potential suffering in the region. Isolationism isn't always the right path.

And if you think Bernie wouldn't support this (like you said), then you have to concede he's not a dogmatic isolationist.
brimstoneSalad wrote:Trump would be really smart to focus his campaign on the assortment of issues the establishment has failed on. If he corners Hillary into having to defend these policies, he'll be able to actually look intelligent and rational by comparison.
I would think he'd primarily focus on money in politics, but apparently he is going to be using that to get funded in the general election, so I'm not sure how impactful it'll be.
There aren't very many policies like these to focus on, but there are enough crazy things like this in U.S. politics that he could distract from other issues by fixating on them.
"I am not a Marxist." -Karl Marx
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

EquALLity wrote: That's what I said. The government-run media endorsed Trump. I didn't say the dictator himself endorsed Trump directly.
IMO he did endorse him indirectly via the media. It's North Korea; do you really think the (government-run) media would be allowed to put out info or opinions the government doesn't support?
I think there's a little wiggle room there. To what extent is it government run, rather than just media in association and with funding from the government (like BBC for example)? Of course all media there is censored, but I don't think we're quite sure to what degree, or on what subjects they're allowed to have their own opinions.

Just saying I wouldn't take this is being quite from the horse's mouth just yet.
EquALLity wrote: Why are you calling it Korea?
I don't think South Korea wants to be grouped in with North Korea. :P
The Korean peninsula.
EquALLity wrote:
brimstoneSalad wrote: He wants to engage in direct talks
That's great, and I don't think any democrats would be opposed to that.
That has been the official policy.
EquALLity wrote:There should be distrust. North Korea shouldn't be trusted. And if it prevents North Korea from harming the South Korean people (which I think it does), then it's important that we keep our soldiers there.
I don't think that's what North Korea wants.
EquALLity wrote:Why do you say that like it's necessarily a good thing?
Washington does not understand Asian culture, or the history there. Chinese are much better equipped to handle the situation.
EquALLity wrote:And if you think Bernie wouldn't support this (like you said), then you have to concede he's not a dogmatic isolationist.
He's an isolationist more in terms of trade relationships, less in terms of warmongering, where he will probably follow U.S. foreign policy, particularly in supporting Israel and South Korea where we should probably stay out of things. He's more concerned with fair outcomes and honoring treaties than with consequences.

The best way we can help Korea (all of it) is to open up trade relationships with the North.

Trade makes corrupt governments rich and comfortable, it encourages them to improve policy and human rights to get even more trade so they can be more rich and comfortable. It makes them feel safe, which makes them safer to the rest of the world. Frightened and desperate governments are dangerous.
Make them rich, and once they have anything they could want, they'll stop being so abusive. It's not really "fair" because the bad guy wins, but that's how it goes. Sometimes you pay the ransom.
User avatar
miniboes
Master of the Forum
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:52 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Netherlands

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by miniboes »

EquALLity wrote:
miniboes wrote:They can't. Their military is extremely weak and it would lead to war with many if not all major western powers. The risk is that they might do serious damage to Seoul, but they will never conquer SK.
Are you sure? They say they have nuclear weapons, and China is their ally. Would the rest of the west get involved if America stays out?

Serious damage to Seoul is enough to keep our troops in South Korea anyway, IMO. There are over ten million people there.
I'm not saying a war between NK and SK would not be an issue, but the idea that NK would conquer SK is just not realistic. A nuclear bomb on Seoul would unleash the wrath of all western nations including the US, even if they do not have troops stationed there at that very moment. China would know better than to defend NK then. They do not have the military power to fight and could face serious trade embargoes. If no non-Korean nation would get involved, SK would still win due to simply having a far superior military. NK does not have the range to launch a bomb much farther than Seoul.
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

EquALLity wrote:
miniboes wrote:They can't. Their military is extremely weak and it would lead to war with many if not all major western powers. The risk is that they might do serious damage to Seoul, but they will never conquer SK.
Are you sure? They say they have nuclear weapons, and China is their ally. Would the rest of the west get involved if America stays out?
I think it's important to note that China and North Korea aren't exactly allies.

North Korea is like the weird kid in school with the trenchcoat, and China is one of the popular kids who is the only person friendly to that kid: one, because they used to be friends before China was popular, and two, because he's worried the kid will lose it and show up one day with a bunch of assault weapons and shoot up the school.
China just doesn't want the North to destabilize any more.

China has much better relationships with South Korea than North Korea. If North Korea were to instigate aggressions, I have little doubt China would march its enormous land army through and occupy it while bombing all of its military targets.
Unlike if the U.S. did this, the people probably would not resist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93South_Korea_relations#Present
The FTA between Korea and China are under discussion. South Korea has been running a trade surplus with China, which hit a record US$32.5 billion in 2009.[...]
The Park-Xi summit in 2013 showed promise of warming relations, but this quickly chilled after China extended their Air Defense Identification Zone (East China Sea) over South Korean territory.[7] Despite this, in July 2014, Xi visited South Korea before its traditional ally North Korea, and in their talks, both leaders affirmed their support for a nuclear-free Korean peninsula and the ongoing free trade agreement negotiations.[8] Both leaders also expressed their concerns over Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe's reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution.
The bolded part is pretty important. Xi visited the South BEFORE the North. Apparently this has happened a few times. And they're continually working on a free trade agreement, and affirming their mutual interest in keeping nuclear weapons out of the North's hands. As well as bonding over mutual resentment of Japan.

Here's a great summary: http://www.cfr.org/china/china-north-korea-relationship/p11097
Experts say China has also been ambivalent on the question of its commitment to defend North Korea in case of military conflict. The 1961 Sino-North Korean Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance says China is obliged to intervene against unprovoked aggression. But Bonnie Glaser of the Center for Strategic and International Studies says the Chinese government has tried to persuade North Korean leaders to revoke the clause that would force Beijing to come to Pyongyang’s defense. Beijing has also said if conflict is initiated by Pyongyang it would not abide by its treaty obligation.
I suggest you read (or skim) the whole article to get some perspective on the issue.
If you read up on the history there you can see the dramatic shift in the relationship.

China doesn't want to be obligated to defend North Korea, and my bet is that they will just claim that any invasion of the North was provoked if done by the South, due to nuclear tests, or a sinking of a ship, etc. They'd probably stay out of it, despite the treaty.

If North Korea acts in aggression, China will probably cooperate in crushing them from the North while the South closes from the other side. They might even cooperate with the U.S. in doing so, but there's a better chance of China resolving the North Korean conflict if the U.S. stays out of it.
Worst case scenario, they'd just stay out of it, particularly if the U.S. isn't involved.

The U.S. is kind of like the police getting involved in a domestic dispute. The man may be beating on his wife, but as soon as the police show up the wife will often attack them too. This is an Asian issue, and Asians don't really want the U.S. involved in it. Chalk it up to history and cultural differences.

Wikipedia offers a good Summary on the China-North Korean relationship as well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93North_Korea_relations
Favorable views of North Korea among Chinese people appear to be receding as well. According to a 2014 BBC World Service Poll, 20% of Chinese people view North Korea's influence positively, with 46% expressing a negative view.[3]
Chinese people think North Korea is nuts, and have more favorable views of the U.S. and South Korea. This probably reflects the Chinese government's attitude too.
China is North Korea's largest trade partner, while North Korea ranked 82nd on the list of China's trade partners (2009 est.) China provides about half of all North Korean imports and received a quarter of its exports.
It's deceptive to say China is North Korea's largest trading partner as if it implies a close relationship or meaningful economic ties. It's a relationship that doesn't in any sense go both ways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China
South Korea is #3 for China. Behind only the U.S. and Japan.
User avatar
EquALLity
I am God
Posts: 3022
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:31 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: United States of Canada

Post by EquALLity »

I think I just spoke with someone who was high or something. o_O
His voice was really mumbly and slurry, and he was saying things that made no sense. Or maybe he was just messing with me.

"I think Donald Trump was born in Kuwait. He wants to bomb the people over there, so maybe he's from there."
"Yeah yeah I'll vote for Bernie, you can get off my case, but what do you think will happen if Donald Trump wins?"
"I'm white and Trump wants to deport me. He wants one person per state."
"I'm the CEO of (didn't catch the company because his voice was so messed up), I don't know how I'm supporting Bernie and I don't even know how you got my personal number. Wikipedia or something?"

I convinced him to vote for Bernie though. Apparently he wasn't going to... :lol:
"I am not a Marxist." -Karl Marx
User avatar
miniboes
Master of the Forum
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:52 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Netherlands

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by miniboes »

A new Joe Rogan Experience podcast episode was released recently. It's a 4 hour 30 conversation with Sam Harris. They speak on length about veg*nism, Trump and AI.

Audio
http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/sam-harris-4

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ5_hAEsLkU
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
User avatar
miniboes
Master of the Forum
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:52 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Netherlands

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by miniboes »

Here's a video of Sam articulating why he thinks Trump is a dangerous candidate. (Outcut from the podcast above)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az1JyDJ_iKU&feature=youtu.be
"I advocate infinite effort on behalf of very finite goals, for example correcting this guy's grammar."
- David Frum
User avatar
Jebus
Master of the Forum
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:08 pm
Diet: Vegan

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by Jebus »

miniboes wrote:A new Joe Rogan Experience podcast episode was released recently. It's a 4 hour 30 conversation with Sam Harris. They speak on length about veg*nism, Trump and AI.

Audio
http://podcasts.joerogan.net/podcasts/sam-harris-4

Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ5_hAEsLkU
If you saw it could you please summarise what was said about veganism since I don't have 4 and a half hours to spare. I love Rogans MMA knowledge and he has a lot of good opinions but in the past he's been hostile and way off on veganism.
How to become vegan in 4.5 hours:
1.Watch Forks over Knives (Health)
2.Watch Cowspiracy (Environment)
3. Watch Earthlings (Ethics)
Congratulations, unless you are a complete idiot you are now a vegan.
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10370
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: Bernie Sanders- Does He Have A Chance?

Post by brimstoneSalad »

Jebus wrote: If you saw it could you please summarise what was said about veganism since I don't have 4 and a half hours to spare. I love Rogans MMA knowledge and he has a lot of good opinions but in the past he's been hostile and way off on veganism.
I think it's mostly the first twenty or so minutes (it seemed like they weren't talking about it after that, so I stopped). If you watch it on double speed, it's not bad. Rogan... he thinks plants and fungi are conscious because he can feel their presence when he takes psychedelic drugs.

I'd also love a breakdown in case there's anything I missed though.
Post Reply