Re: Dr. Fauci on wearing masks. WTF?
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:17 am
Sorry for not responding for so long, the university has been killing me.
Actually, I do think seatbelt mandates have a burden of proof. Maybe that burden of proof has been met. Maybe not. But I am quite sure the burden of proof for mask mandates has not been met.thebestofenergy wrote:An example why force wouldn't mean burden of proof is seatbelts mandates
Again, maybe the burden of proof has been met for this. Maybe not. Either way...thebestofenergy wrote:helmet mandates
Well, it is complicated. And quite different from government mandates.thebestofenergy wrote:self defense
Well, to be honest, I am a bit skeptical whether they work. Obviously, they might lead to false sense of security or false sense of danger.thebestofenergy wrote:speed limit regulations
Well, it is hard to tell. Cops are not perfect.thebestofenergy wrote:arrests to stop harmful behavior
Well, again, it is complicated. Cops are not perfect. They may be deluded that there is a bomb which somebody is trying to detonate. In which case, yes, it is useful to ask them for a proof beyond reasonable doubt.thebestofenergy wrote:or to a cop arresting someone trying to detonate a bomb and kill others
Calling me "a complete moron" does not prove you are right.thebestofenergy wrote:The fact that masks help and save countless lives has been proven way beyond reasonable doubt for anyone that isn't a complete moron, and scientific consensus supports that.
Seriously? Where are those experts? Where are those large-scale studies like the Danish study finding no effect for seatbelts?thebestofenergy wrote: But not all experts agree seatbelts help
As far as I know, all the experts agree seatbelts reduce your chance of dying in a car accident by at least a half. The same is obviously not true for masks.thebestofenergy wrote:those experts who think that seatbelts help, they mostly think seatbelts provide only marginal protection