Why Do You Eat Animals?

Vegan message board for support on vegan related issues and questions.
Topics include philosophy, activism, effective altruism, plant-based nutrition, and diet advice/discussion whether high carb, low carb (eco atkins/vegan keto) or anything in between.
Meat eater vs. Vegan debate welcome, but please keep it within debate topics.
Post Reply
Humane Hominid
Junior Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 9:11 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Humane Hominid »

Morality and ethics are grounded in what we perceive to best for the well-being of conscious creatures. Because they're based on perceptions, and perceptions are empirically testable, it is logical to assume that some moralities are simply mistaken... that is to say, factually and therefore objectively wrong... about whether they actually promote the well-being of conscious creatures.

Cannibals are mistaken that their morality promotes the well-being of conscious creatures. Therefore, they are wrong, even if they think they're not. Just as flat-earthers are wrong, even if they think they're not. Human opinion is irrelevant to factual claims, and all statements of morality can be reduced to factual claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.

Moral relativism is thus neither true, nor a viable defense of any action that others deem immoral. It doesn't matter if your personal morality tells you it's OK to stab and eat everything on the planet; your opinion isn't relevant on the matter. Your personal morality is an implicit factual claim that stabbing and eating everything promotes the well-being of conscious creatures. That claim is testable, and in all likelihood wrong (as most claims and hypotheses are).

If the practice of stabbing and eating everything on the planet does not, objectively and factually, promote the well-being of conscious creatures better than, say, veganism does, then the practice is wrong, objectively and factually.
Eat kind, be strong.
Dudugs
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:31 pm

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Dudugs »

Humane Hominid wrote:Morality and ethics are grounded in what we perceive to best for the well-being of conscious creatures. Because they're based on perceptions, and perceptions are empirically testable, it is logical to assume that some moralities are simply mistaken... that is to say, factually and therefore objectively wrong... about whether they actually promote the well-being of conscious creatures.

Cannibals are mistaken that their morality promotes the well-being of conscious creatures. Therefore, they are wrong, even if they think they're not. Just as flat-earthers are wrong, even if they think they're not. Human opinion is irrelevant to factual claims, and all statements of morality can be reduced to factual claims about the well-being of conscious creatures.

Moral relativism is thus neither true, nor a viable defense of any action that others deem immoral. It doesn't matter if your personal morality tells you it's OK to stab and eat everything on the planet; your opinion isn't relevant on the matter. Your personal morality is an implicit factual claim that stabbing and eating everything promotes the well-being of conscious creatures. That claim is testable, and in all likelihood wrong (as most claims and hypotheses are).

If the practice of stabbing and eating everything on the planet does not, objectively and factually, promote the well-being of conscious creatures better than, say, veganism does, then the practice is wrong, objectively and factually.
Don't you understand? Don't apply your morality to others. Cannibals know that they cause suffering. However not everyone is like you, wanting to avoid suffering from all creatures. Cannibals want to avoid suffering from themselves and people they like, omnivores want to avoid suffering of their own species and vegans want to avoid suffering from animals and people. All of them know about the suffering. And none of them are right or wrong. According to cannibals, their morality is the best one. According to omnivores, their morality is the right one and according to vegans, their morality is the right one. According to the law, the cannibal morality is wrong.

Your error here is assuming those three different moralities want to avoid suffering from everything.
We gotta save the bees!
User avatar
Volenta
Master in Training
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 5:13 pm
Diet: Vegan

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Volenta »

Dudugs wrote:Morality is the rules that define the right and wrong. In my morality literally stabbing and eating everything in this planet may be okay, but that doesn't mean my morality is wrong. Of course other people will try to stop me from doing so, because everyone thinks their morality is the best.
I think you're confusing actual morality and the personal sense of morality. Just like in every other domain—from history to biology and linguistics to health—you can be wrong on the facts. In the case of morality, this is when the consequences of your actions don't benefit the wellbeing of other sentient creatures. In addition to Humane Hominid's post I suggest you read Sam Harris' book The Moral Landscape.
Dudugs wrote:However not everyone is like you, wanting to avoid suffering from all creatures.
That only proves they are wrong. Even though they don't have the same objective, morality in it's foundation is about avoiding suffering.
Dudugs wrote:Cannibals want to avoid suffering from themselves and people they like, omnivores want to avoid suffering of their own species and vegans want to avoid suffering from animals and people. All of them know about the suffering. And none of them are right or wrong. According to cannibals, their morality is the best one. According to omnivores, their morality is the right one and according to vegans, their morality is the right one. According to the law, the cannibal morality is wrong.
It's an expansion of our moral circle, where vegans are going even one step further based on the realization that speciesism doesn't hold any water. It only demonstrates our progressive in understanding on what morality is about.
Dudugs
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:31 pm

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Dudugs »

Volenta wrote:
Dudugs wrote:Morality is the rules that define the right and wrong. In my morality literally stabbing and eating everything in this planet may be okay, but that doesn't mean my morality is wrong. Of course other people will try to stop me from doing so, because everyone thinks their morality is the best.
I think you're confusing actual morality and the personal sense of morality. Just like in every other domain—from history to biology and linguistics to health—you can be wrong on the facts. In the case of morality, this is when the consequences of your actions don't benefit the wellbeing of other sentient creatures. In addition to Humane Hominid's post I suggest you read Sam Harris' book The Moral Landscape.
Dudugs wrote:However not everyone is like you, wanting to avoid suffering from all creatures.
That only proves they are wrong. Even though they don't have the same objective, morality in it's foundation is about avoiding suffering.
Dudugs wrote:Cannibals want to avoid suffering from themselves and people they like, omnivores want to avoid suffering of their own species and vegans want to avoid suffering from animals and people. All of them know about the suffering. And none of them are right or wrong. According to cannibals, their morality is the best one. According to omnivores, their morality is the right one and according to vegans, their morality is the right one. According to the law, the cannibal morality is wrong.
It's an expansion of our moral circle, where vegans are going even one step further based on the realization that speciesism doesn't hold any water. It only demonstrates our progressive in understanding on what morality is about.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... h/morality

Read a fucking dictionary.
We gotta save the bees!
User avatar
Volenta
Master in Training
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 5:13 pm
Diet: Vegan

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Volenta »

Dudugs wrote:http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... h/morality

Read a fucking dictionary.
There is nothing in there that contradicts me. The discussion on moral realism and relativism isn't to be found in the dictionary though, so why do you appeal to it?
Dudugs
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:31 pm

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Dudugs »

Volenta wrote:
Dudugs wrote:http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... h/morality

Read a fucking dictionary.
There is nothing in there that contradicts me. The discussion on moral realism and relativism isn't to be found in the dictionary though, so why do you appeal to it?

You claim morality in it's foundation it's about avoiding suffering. Morality is a set of rules that distinguish good or bad.
We gotta save the bees!
User avatar
thebestofenergy
Master in Training
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 5:49 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Italy

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by thebestofenergy »

Dudugs wrote:Read a fucking dictionary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIh2xe4jnpk
You claim morality in it's foundation it's about avoiding suffering. Morality is a set of rules that distinguish good or bad.
And the set of rules that distinguish good or bad are based on..?
Come on, a bit of effort and you might get there.
For evil to prevail, good people must stand aside and do nothing.
Dudugs
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:31 pm

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Dudugs »

thebestofenergy wrote:
Dudugs wrote:Read a fucking dictionary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIh2xe4jnpk
You claim morality in it's foundation it's about avoiding suffering. Morality is a set of rules that distinguish good or bad.
And the set of rules that distinguish good or bad are based on..?
Come on, a bit of effort and you might get there.
I'm gonna admit, I laughed a bit when you posted that youtube video.

Those set of rules don't exist to avoid all suffering, they exist because when we were evolving, someone who didn't go around kill members of his pack would be much more succesful than another.
We gotta save the bees!
User avatar
Volenta
Master in Training
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 5:13 pm
Diet: Vegan

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Volenta »

Dudugs wrote:Those set of rules don't exist to avoid all suffering, they exist because when we were evolving, someone who didn't go around kill members of his pack would be much more succesful than another.
And this is the confusion I talked about. Morality is NOT your sense of morality. Evolution doesn't create morality. All evolution does is give you a sense of empathy and altruism, but this should not be confused with actual morality. Because evolution has created senses that are right on the subject is only by accident.
Dudugs
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:31 pm

Re: Why Do You Eat Animals?

Post by Dudugs »

Volenta wrote:
Dudugs wrote:Those set of rules don't exist to avoid all suffering, they exist because when we were evolving, someone who didn't go around kill members of his pack would be much more succesful than another.
And this is the confusion I talked about. Morality is NOT your sense of morality. Evolution doesn't create morality. All evolution does is give you a sense of empathy and altruism, but this should not be confused with actual morality. Because evolution has created senses that are right on the subject is only by accident.
Morality is the differentiation of good and bad. Moral sense is having the ability of using morality in various situations.
We gotta save the bees!
Post Reply