Assuming it was citric acid that was beneficial, whole food sources would likely come with a lot of sugar, and promote tooth decay (due to acid exposure).garrethdsouza wrote: I had come across it here http://kidneystones.uchicago.edu/citrat ... nt-stones/
Unless unavoidable, a whole food plant based source would probably be better.
However, based on my knowledge of chemistry and biology, I think you may have misread that report. They're administering alkaline citrate salts (like potassium citrate) which make it into the bladder to raise pH.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium_citrate
I'm a little surprised it doesn't disassociate in stomach acid, but maybe due to its high solubility it doesn't have time.
Citric acid on its own shows up free in the blood and is quickly oxidized/metabolized by the vast majority of people, only a fraction of a percent making it into the urine with extremely high doses.
Here's an old study: http://www.jbc.org/content/113/1/265.full.pdf
Calcium citrate has a low solubility, and IIRC would be expected to disassociate in the stomach to neutralize stomach acid. The calcium would become calcium chloride (reacting with the HCl), and the citrate would become free citric acid. Both would ultimately enter the blood, the citrate being metabolized (gone, as if it had never been), and the chloride providing calcium and chloride ions in the blood (for whatever purpose the body would put them).
A biochemist could answer this question better than I can, but I can't see the citrate form being meaningfully different, aside from perhaps that it provides free citrate ions in the stomach that might assist in the chelation of other minerals there (forming Iron citrate, perhaps, or competing with oxalates). In that sense it would be a bit better than a carbonate. I suppose a phosphate would be the least desirable if you have issues with stones.