RedAppleGP wrote:
When can I apply to be one?
Your information is already on file. (Thanks, NSA!)
PsYcHo wrote:
Wouldn't it be anti-PC to describe ones self as PC? The whole anti-label bit.
RedAppleGP wrote:
How exactly?
Using a label to describe someone is a PC no-no. You
cannot be a male, you are a person. You are not a [insert sexual preference here], you want to have enthusiastic, consensual relations with another equally enthusiastic, consensual person. (Xe will enjoy it very much, maybe? Otherwise you are a horrible
person! (You evil misogynist
)).
PsYcHo wrote:
(Flips thru PC handbook..) Then you are racist, sexist, and etc.ist..... (How do you live with yourself?)
RedAppleGP wrote:
Uh yeah yep that sounds about right
At least you are an honest ist. (But I am required by law to hate you.... damn ist-ist!)
I assume this 3 second video is a (poorly) veiled attack at my sexual (consentuality enthusiastically given!) prowess. (Or lack therof..) Just like the
person in this video, my partners were all smiles! (Short smiles, followed by a "you did your best', but smiles none the less!)
So..... draw any non-copyrighted (as far as you know..) ponies lately?...
Alcohol may have been a factor.
Taxation is theft.
