Animal protection is the most noble cause

Vegan message board for support on vegan related issues and questions.
Topics include philosophy, activism, effective altruism, plant-based nutrition, and diet advice/discussion whether high carb, low carb (eco atkins/vegan keto) or anything in between.
Meat eater vs. Vegan debate welcome, but please keep it within debate topics.
Post Reply
KAICHEN1988
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 pm
Religion: None (Atheist)

Animal protection is the most noble cause

Post by KAICHEN1988 » Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:43 pm

I have got empathy for animals since I was a child. When I was growing up, my faith and values changed several times, but my love and empathy for animals never changed. Now I already know that animal protection is the most noble cause.

Below is a brief summary of my animal protection principles.


We must protect animals.

Like human beings, animals have consciousness and feeling, and can experience suffering and happiness.

No one wants suffering, and neither do animals. This is a sufficient reason to protect animals.

We do not advocate "protecting plants".

Plants do not have brain or nerve, so they never have any consciousness or feeling at all.

Therefore, in terms of morality, it is not necessary to protect plants.

We do not advocate "protecting mosquitoes".

Vertebrate animals, especially mammals and birds, have developed advanced nervous systems, therefore having strong feeling and consciousness.

However, most invertebrates, such as insects, only have a very simple nervous system, which means that their feeling and consciousness are very weak.

We must not kill animals, even though animals keep killing each other.

If a child who is three or four years old killed a man, you cannot condemn the child, because it knows nothing. Similarly, animals should not be condemned for killing others, because animals have low intelligence and cannot understand that their behaviors bring suffering to other individuals. In fact, many animals have the same intelligence level as a child.

However, adult humans' intelligence is high enough for them to know that their behaviors may bring suffering to other individuals. Therefore, for adult humans, doing such behaviors is obviously evil.

We must not follow the law of nature.

The natural law that allows the stronger ones to prey upon the weaker ones runs counter to human morality. If not, there would be no need to protect the disadvantaged groups.

The laws of nature are brutal, but human morality is empathetic. Human beings must fight against the brutality and stop the killing.

We should be more concerned about animals than people.

The suffering and misery faced by animals are far more severe than people's hardship. At least the people are not being murdered or tortured.

Moreover, humans can be good or evil, but animals are all innocent and lovable, just like children.

Rich people and elites have strong power, but always squander the power on luxurious lives and meaningless faiths. I will be the owner of power, and use the power to make the greatest contribution to animal protection.

User avatar
cornivore
Full Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:23 am
Religion: Other
Diet: Vegan

Post by cornivore » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:09 am

You had me at mosquito... :?:
KAICHEN1988 wrote:
Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:43 pm
We do not advocate "protecting mosquitoes".
Some flowers, such as orchids, are dependent on mosquitoes for pollination . . . Image
Typically, both male and female mosquitoes feed on nectar and plant juices, but in many species the mouthparts of the females are adapted for piercing the skin of animal hosts... Female mosquitoes use two very different food sources. They need sugar for energy, which is taken from sources such as nectar, and they need blood as a source of protein for egg development. In contrast, male mosquitoes are not bloodsuckers; they only drink sugary fluids . . .
Likewise, hummingbirds get energy from nectar, and eat mosquitoes or other insects for protein, etc. Image

Well, if we advocate protecting the birds and the bees, and the flowers and the trees, then maybe we shouldn't exclude all of those mosquitoes either (because the birds and the flowers rely on them, for example)... I look at it this way: we have the joy of tasting sugar in common. ;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests